|
State Bar of Texas Health Law Section Report (Fall 1996) IRS Grants Exempt Status to 5.01(a) Client: By
letter dated June 19, 1996,(1) the Internal Revenue Service
("IRS") granted C.H. Wilkinson Physician Network
("Network"), a Texas nonprofit corporation that has been
certified to practice medicine by the Texas State Board of Medical
Examiners ("TSBME") the sole corporate member of which is SCH
Health Care System ("SCH"), exemption from federal income tax as
an organization described in section 5.01(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Code (the "Code"). The favorable determination letter for
Network, now a public document, is the first to be received by a Texas
nonprofit corporation certified by the TSBME ("CNPC") since the
IRS began applying its integrated delivery system ("IDS")
analysis to physician practice groups. Significantly, the IRS review
specifically took into account the current TSBME rules governing CNPCs
even though Network was incorporated prior to their adoption. Receipt
by the Network of its favorable determination letter presumably signals
the breakup of the IRS logjam that has thwarted CNPCs from being
recognized as organizations described in section 5.01(c)(3) of the Code,
despite the submission of some applications as long as four years ago.
That logjam, attributed by most industry observers to the position of the
IRS that physician practice organizations created as part of an IDS must
have governing boards no more than 20 percent of the members of which are
physicians, has been frustrating for Texas hospitals and CNPCs inasmuch as
tax-exempt CNPCs offer much greater flexibility to tax-exempt hospitals
that establish CNPCs. That flexibility is particularly important with
respect to the capitalization or other funding of a CNPC. Recognizing
that the TSBME rules governing CNPCs are irreconcilable with its
requirement that physician representation on the governing board of a
physician practice component of an IDS be limited to 20 percent, the IRS
concluded that the appropriate focus for determining qualification for
exemption for a CNPC is the relationship between the CNPC and the
tax-exempt hospital that establishes the CNPC. That relationship,
inextricably linked to the TSBME rules covering certification, is the
heart of the determination letter analysis. Specifically, the IRS
concluded that the Network qualified as an organization described in
section 5.01(c)(3) of the Code because its relationship with SCH
demonstrated that the Network operated to further SCH's charitable
purposes. The components of the relationship that the IRS determined to be
crucial to its favorable conclusion include the following: 1.
SCH's right to amend, alter or repeal Network's Articles of Incorporation
and Bylaws. 2.
SCH's right to approve significant actions including: a.
Network's annual operating and capital budgets and significant deviations
from such budgets; b.
Network's sale, lease, mortgage or other transfer or encumbrance of real
property or, above certain limits, personal property; c.
Merger, acquisition, consolidation, liquidation, or dissolution actions
undertaken by Network; d.
Network's giving or seeking of grants; e.
Network's physician compensation agreements, including benefits and
incentives; f.
Appointment, election or removal, and establishing or changing the number,
of Network's directors, with removal being with or without cause; g.
Settlement of claims and litigation involving Network; and h.
Selection of Network's auditors. Although
the foregoing control provisions are of paramount importance to Network's
ability to qualify as an organization described in section 5.01(c)(3) of
the Code, the determination letter cites several other requirements that
Network has, or has agreed to, fulfill. First, Network has acquired, and
will acquire in the future, physician practices for no more than fair
market value in transactions that comply with all applicable state and
federal laws. Second, Network has a policy of nondiscrimination regarding
Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries and has committed to provide a level
of medical care to indigent persons, on both an emergency and nonemergency
basis, consistent with Network's available resources and taking into
account Network's need to fund its ongoing activities. Third, the fee
schedules established by Network are subject
to review by SCH. Fourth, Network has established a compensation committee
none of the members of whom are physicians to make determinations with
respect to compensation, including incentive compensation and benefits.
Network has represented that compensation paid will be reasonable and will
take into account compensation levels reflected in national, regional and
local surveys and that incentive compensation payments will be subject to
annual caps. Fifth, and finally, Network agreed to amend its Bylaws to
include the model conflicts of interest policy promulgated by the IRS. Good
news for Network, the determination letter is also good news for other
CNPCs established by tax-exempt hospitals since it details the
considerations that must be taken into account to satisfy the IRS. Todd
Greenwalt, Health Care Section, Vinson & Elkins, Houston, Texas. Footnote: |